Students’ Learning Challenges in Database Courses: A Survey Study in Information Technology Education

Authors

  • Sitti Suhada Makassar State University
  • Syahrul Syahrul Makassar State University
  • Ahmad Rifqi Asrib Makassar State University
  • Sanatang Sanatang Makassar State University

Keywords:

Database learning Student challenges ERD SQL tools IT education Survey

Abstract

Database literacy sits at the core of modern IT education, yet how students actually experience the database course, and where they stumble, remains underexplored at the institutional level. This paper reports findings from a survey of 56 undergraduate students enrolled in the database course at the Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia, drawn from two study programs: Information Technology Education (PTI, n = 27) and Information Systems (SI, n = 29). An open-ended questionnaire was used; responses were analyzed through qualitative content analysis and coded into thematic clusters. Six categories emerged. Most students (60.7%) navigated the course without major friction, while the remaining 39.3% reported concrete difficulties: Entity Relationship Diagram and normalization confusion stood out at 14.3%, followed by tool and SQL environment issues (8.9%), instructional quality gaps (8.9%), a felt disconnect between theory and hands-on work (5.4%), and hardware access limitations (1.8%). Taken together, the data suggest that while the course works well for the majority, a non-trivial minority needs targeted support, particularly around conceptual modeling and teaching responsiveness.

References

[1] [1] Connolly, Thomas M., and Carolyn E. Begg. Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation, and Management. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. ISBN 978-0-13-294326-0.

[2] Taipalus, Toni, Mikko Siponen, and Tero Vartiainen. "Errors and Complications in SQL Query Formulation." ACM Transactions on Computing Education 18, no. 3 (2018): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231712

[3] Sadiq, Shazia, Sourav Bhowmick, and Graham Brown. "Identifying Difficulties in Learning Conceptual Data Modeling." In Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Database Conference, 105-113. Darlinghurst: Australian Computer Society, 2004.

[4] Smelcer, John B. "User Errors in Database Query Composition." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 42, no. 4 (1995): 353-381. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1017

[5] Mannila, Linda, and Mirja Peltomaki. "It Is Just a Program, Nothing More or Less: Students’ Conceptions of Computing." In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research, 101-108. New York: ACM, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1145/1315803.1315821

[6] Taipalus, Toni. "Database Management System Error Messages for Novice Users." In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 284-290. New York: ACM, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387412

[7] Porter, Leo, Mark Guzdial, Charlie McDowell, and Beth Simon. "Success in Introductory Programming: What Works?" Communications of the ACM 56, no. 8 (2013): 34-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492007.2492020

[8] Surjono, Herman Dwi, Ali Muhtadi, and Dian Wahyuningsih. "The Development of Interactive Multimedia-Based E-Learning for Computer Network Course." Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 1, no. 1 (2017): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.383556

[9] Prather, James, Raymond Pettit, Kayla McMurry, Amey Peters, John Homer, and Mike Cohen. "On the Difficulties of Learning to Program." In Proceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 1-10. New York: ACM, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279720.3279741

[10] Ko, Andrew J., Thomas D. LaToza, and Margaret M. Burnett. "A Practical Guide to Controlled Experiments of Software Engineering Tools with Human Participants." Empirical Software Engineering 20, no. 1 (2015): 110-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9279-3

[11] Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2018. ISBN 978-1-5063-8670-6

[12] Patton, Michael Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4129-7212-3.

[13] Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4833-4980-0.

[14] Mayring, Philipp. "Qualitative Content Analysis." A Companion to Qualitative Research 1, no. 2 (2004): 159-176.

[15] Ahadi, Alireza, Vahid Behbood, Aman Yadav, Jamie Fraser, and Raymond Lister. "Students’ Difficulties with Recursion, and Hints to Make It Easier." In Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference, 162-170. Darlinghurst: Australian Computer Society, 2015.

[16] Fisher, Robert J. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning." Journal of Consumer Research 20, no. 2 (1993): 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351

[17] Mitrovic, Antonija. "Learning SQL with a Computerized Tutor." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 30, no. 1 (1998): 307-311. https://doi.org/10.1145/274790.274463

[18] Mitrovic, Antonija, Brent Martin, Pramuditha Suraweera, Konstantin Zakharov, Neil Milik, James Holland, and Nigel McGuigan. "ASPIRE: An Authoring System and Deployment Environment for Constraint-Based Tutors." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, no. 2 (2009): 155-188.

[19] Vygotsky, Lev S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. ISBN 978-0-674-57629-2.

[20] Leinonen, Juho, Kalle Longi, Arto Klami, and Arto Hellas. "Automatic Inference of Programming Performance and Experience from Typing Patterns." In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, 132-137. New York: ACM, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844612

[21] Watermeyer, Richard, Tom Crick, Cathryn Knight, and Janet Goodall. "COVID-19 and Digital Disruption in UK Universities: Afflictions and Affordances of Emergency Online Migration." Higher Education 81, no. 3 (2021): 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y

[22] Umbach, Paul D., and Matthew R. Wawrzynski. "Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement." Research in Higher Education 46, no. 2 (2005): 153-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1

[23] Krajcik, Joseph S., and Namsoo Shin. "Project-Based Learning." In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. Keith Sawyer, 275-297. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018

[24] Warschauer, Mark, and Tina Matuchniak. "New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes." Review of Research in Education 34, no. 1 (2010): 179-225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Suhada, S., Syahrul, S., Rifqi Asrib, A., & Sanatang, S. (2026). Students’ Learning Challenges in Database Courses: A Survey Study in Information Technology Education. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Commons, 1(1), 176–184. Retrieved from https://internationalconference.pasqapro.com/index.php/icaidc/article/view/212